Congressman Speaks Out Against "Disabled VeteransTax"
They fought and sacrificed for our nation, but are retired, disabled veterans getting a fair shake? Some don't think so, and Georgia Third District Rep. Jim Marshall (D) says it's time for a change. Speaking at a "give the vets a vote" rally, Marshall called for a vote on legislation that would allow disabled veterans
to receive both disability and retirement benefits without penalty.
Under a law that dates back to 1891, a veteran who is entitled to a retirement benefit and a disability payment will see a reduction in his retirement benefit equal to the amount he gets in his disability payment. Congressman Marshall calls this a "disabled veterans tax," and says it's time to change the law.
"What we've done to military retirees who are disabled is take away their disability benefit," he said. "We've basically imposed a 100 percent tax on disabled military retirees. It's never been right. Everybody agrees it needs to be fixed. The bill to fix it has been sitting there for 16 years. We want a vote on the bill."
According to a report published by Marshall, disabled veterans in Georgia lose over $130 million annually because of the this issue.
"I am 20 percent disabled by VA," said disabled veteran Leon Leach. "I was given the option to take the VA or take my full retirement check. I took the VA benefit because it's tax free, but they take 200 and some dollars from my monthly retirement check."
Marshall says the majority of house members are in favor of the bill, but each year it gets bottled up in committees by the leadership. He is calling on members of Congress who truly support veterans to sign a discharge petition to end what he calls the disabled veterans tax. A discharge petition is a special rule that allows a majority of the House of Representatives to force a vote on an issue that's still in committee. Marshall says he has 202 of the 218 votes he needs to force the vote.
Reported by: Ron Wallace, firstname.lastname@example.org
Subj: Answer to Senator Murray (D) Washington
Date: 8/19/03 2:06:26 AM Central Daylight Time
All of your senators and representatives will be
answering our e-mails with all the "sugar" they
can muster. We need to e-mail them
about conccurrent receipt and then when they
answer back, like most will, "Well I tried but the
President vetoed the
bill." Bull crap, haven't they heard of a veto
override vote? Basically I reminded mine of that,
am waiting for an answer, also reminded
them that this is sort of a
performance review for their "continued
employment". Some of my politicians are up for
Please put pressure on them.
Thank you for your response to my e-mail re:
Concurrent Receipt. I believe, if I am not
mistaken, that the senate has the power to
vote to override a veto by the President. Am I
correct? I believe that this bill is so important
to the veteran and election issues that if
the President does in fact veto the Concurrent
Receipt Bill, that we should see an effort to
override that issue and that the people
and/or representatives that fail to vote in favor
of the issue), should be asked why. I also
believe, and will do it, that if able, I will
obtain the voting record of this bill and publish
it on all the veteran sites. I believe every
person, veteran or not, should
know how his senator/representative is taking care
of business that pertains to that and other
individuals in the same class.